{"id":172,"date":"2021-09-01T20:11:40","date_gmt":"2021-09-01T20:11:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lsi.asulaw.org\/softlaw\/?post_type=report&p=172"},"modified":"2021-10-18T21:07:38","modified_gmt":"2021-10-18T21:07:38","slug":"references","status":"publish","type":"report","link":"https:\/\/lsi.asulaw.org\/softlaw\/report\/references\/","title":{"rendered":"References"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n \n
\n \n\n
\n \n\n

<\/p>\n\n

References<\/h1>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n<\/div>\n\n\n
\n
\n

[1] J. Fjeld, N. Achten, H. Hilligoss, A. Nagy, and M. Srikumar, \u201cPrincipled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI,\u201d SSRN Electron. J., Feb. 2020, doi: 10.2139\/ ssrn.3518482.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[2] A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, \u201cThe global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,\u201d Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389\u2013399, 2019, doi: 10.1038\/s42256-019-0088-2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[3] Z. Munn, M. D. J. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris, \u201cSystematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach,\u201d BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 143, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1186\/s12874-018-0611-x.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[4] H. Arksey and L. O\u2019Malley, \u201cScoping studies: Towards a methodological framework,\u201d Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19\u201332, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1080\/1364557032000119616.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[5] S. Anderson, P. Allen, S. Peckham, and N. Goodwin, \u201cAsking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services,\u201d Health Research Policy and Systems, vol. 6, no. 1. BioMed Central, p. 7, Jul. 09, 2008, doi: 10.1186\/1478-4505-6-7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[6] G. Marchant, \u201c\u2018Soft Law\u2019 Governance Of Artificial Intelligence.\u201d AI Pulse, 2019, [Online]. Available: https:\/\/aipulse.org\/soft-law-governance-of-artificial-intelligence\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[7] G. Marchant, L. Tournas, and C. I. Gutierrez, \u201cGoverning Emerging Technologies Through Soft Law: Lessons for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d Jurimetrics, vol. 61, no. 1, 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[8] G. E. Marchant and B. Allenby, \u201cSoft law: New tools for governing emerging technologies,\u201d Bull. At. Sci., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 108\u2013114, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1080\/00963402.2017.1288447.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[9] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson, 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[10] S. Legg and M. Hutter, \u201cA Collection of Definitions of Intelligence,\u201d Jun. 2007, Accessed: Jan. 09, 2021. [Online]. Available: http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/0706.3639.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[11] OECD.AI, \u201cThe OECD Artificial Intelligence Policy Observatory,\u201d 2020, 2020. https:\/\/oecd.ai\/ (accessed Dec. 14, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[12] Algorithm Watch, \u201cAI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory,\u201d Algorithm Watch, vol. 2019, pp. 1\u20139, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 14, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/inventory.algorithmwatch.org\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[13] AI Ethicist, \u201cEthical AI,\u201d 2021. https:\/\/www.aiethicist.org\/ (accessed Jan. 10, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[14] T. Lysaght, H. Y. Lim, V. Xafis, and K. Y. Ngiam, \u201cAI-Assisted Decision-making in Healthcare: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research,\u201d Asian Bioeth. Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 299\u2013314, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007\/s41649-019-00096-0.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[15] C. J. Kelly, A. Karthikesalingam, M. Suleyman, G. Corrado, and D. King, \u201cKey challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence,\u201d BMC Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1. BioMed Central Ltd., p. 195, Oct. 29, 2019, doi: 10.1186\/ s12916-019-1426-2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[16] M. Perc, M. Ozer, and J. Hojnik, \u201cSocial and Juristic Challenges of Artificial Intelligence,\u201d Palgrave Communications, vol. 5, no. 1. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., pp. 1\u20137, Dec. 01, 2019, doi: 10.1057\/s41599-019-0278-x<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[17] INDIGENOUS AI, \u201cIndigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence Working Group.\u201d http:\/\/www.indigenous-ai. net\/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[18] Finn AI, \u201c3 Ethical Considerations When Implementing AI For Your Bank – Finn AI.\u201d https:\/\/www.finn.ai\/ethics-ofai-in-banking\/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[19] Force 11, \u201cGuiding Principles for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable Data Publishing version b1.0.\u201d https:\/\/www.force11.org\/fairprinciples (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[20] National Police Foundation, \u201cNational Police Foundation Publishes Best Practices Guide for Police Open Data.\u201d https:\/\/www.policefoundation.org\/national-police-foundation-publishes-best-practices-guide-for-police-open-data\/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[21] Philips, \u201cFive guiding principles for responsible use of AI in healthcare and healthy living – Blog.\u201d https:\/\/www. philips.com\/a-w\/about\/news\/archive\/blogs\/innovation-matters\/2020\/20200121-five-guiding-principles-for-responsibleuse-of-ai-in-healthcare-and-healthy-living.html (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[22] Government of Norway, \u201cNational Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2020. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.regjeringen.no\/ki-strategi,.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[22] Government of Norway, \u201cNational Strategy for Artificial Intell[23] Sipri, \u201cThe Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.sipri.org.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[24] Women Leading in AI, \u201c10 Principles of Responsible AI.\u201d http:\/\/womenleadinginai.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/WLiAI-Report-2019.pdf (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[25] M. Gelles, A. Mirkow, and J. Mariani, \u201cThe future of law enforcement Policing strategies to meet the challenges of evolving technology and a changing world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[26] Booz Allen Hamilton, \u201c4 Ways to Preserve Privacy in Artificial Intelligence.\u201d https:\/\/www.boozallen.com\/s\/solution\/four-ways-to-preserve-privacy-in-ai.html (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[27] Ernst & Young, \u201cHow AI can be a force for good in government | EY – Global.\u201d https:\/\/www.ey.com\/en_gl\/consulting\/how-ai-can-be-a-force-for-good-in-government (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[28] World Bank, \u201cWorld Bank Country and Lending Groups,\u201d The World Bank. 2020, Accessed: Dec. 28, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/datahelpdesk.worldbank.org\/knowledgebase\/articles\/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[29] OECD, \u201cRecommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence.\u201d 2019, doi: 10.1017\/ilm.2020.5.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[30] AI Forum – New Zeland, \u201cArtificial Intelligence for Agriculture in New Zealand,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/aiforum.org.nz\/reports\/ai-for-agriculture-in-new-zealand\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[31] Government of Luxembourg, \u201cArtificial Intelligence: opportunities, risks and recommendations for the financial sector,\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[32] S. Pichai, \u201cAI at Google: our principles,\u201d 2018-07-07, p. 1, 2018, Accessed: Dec. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.blog.google\/technology\/ai\/ai-principles\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[33] Deutsche Telekom, \u201cDigital Ethics Guidelines on AI,\u201d 2018. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.telekom.com\/resource\/blob\/544510\/ca70d6697d35ba60fbcb29aeef4529e8\/dl-181008-digitale-ethik-en-data.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[34] Graham Webster, Rogier Creemers, Paul Triolo, and Elsa Kania, \u201cFull Translation: China\u2019s \u2018New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan\u2019 (2017),\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.newamerica.org\/cybersecurity-initiative\/digichina\/blog\/ full-translation-chinas-new-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan-2017\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[35] Government of Japan, \u201cNew Robot Strategy: Japan\u2019s Robot Strategy,\u201d 2015. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.meti.go.jp\/english\/press\/2015\/pdf\/0123_01b.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[36] European Commission, \u201cThe Age of Artificial Intelligence: Towards a European Strategy for Human-Centric Machines | JRC Science Hub Communities,\u201d 2018. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/jrc\/ communities\/en\/community\/digitranscope\/document\/age-artificial-intelligence-towards-european-strategy-human-centric.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[37] International Association of Privacy Professionals, \u201cWhite Paper \u2013 Building Ethics into Privacy Frameworks for Big Data and AI,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/iapp.org\/resources\/article\/building-ethics-into-privacy-frameworks-for-big-data-and-ai\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[38] European Commission, \u201cCOMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS: A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems, a milestone towards cooperative, connected and automated mobility,\u201d 2016. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/EN\/TXT\/PDF\/?uri=CELEX- %3A52016DC0766&from=EN.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[39] Samsung Research, \u201cPrinciples for AI Ethics.\u201d https:\/\/research.samsung.com\/artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[40] Microsoft, \u201cResponsible AI Principles from Microsoft,\u201d 2020. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/en-us\/ai\/responsible-ai?activetab=pivot1%3Aprimaryr6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[41] OpenAI, \u201cAbout OpenAI.\u201d 2019, [Online]. Available: https:\/\/openai.com\/about\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[42] Association of Computing Machinery, \u201cCode of Ethics and Professional Conduct,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.acm.org\/ code-of-ethics (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[43] Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, \u201cCODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.aaai.org\/Conferences\/code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[44] Society of Actuaries, \u201cEthical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Actuaries 2 Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Actuaries,\u201d 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[45] Digital Signage Federation, \u201cDigital Signage Privacy Standards,\u201d 2011. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: http:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/os\/2009\/02\/P085400behavadreport.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[46] Appen, \u201cAppen Announces Crowd Code of Ethics to Build Better AI | Appen,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/appen.com\/blog\/ appen-announces-crowd-code-of-ethics-to-build-better-ai\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[47] Kogniz, \u201cCode of conduct.\u201d https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200614133201\/https:\/\/www.kogniz.com\/code-ofconduct (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[48] AI Singapore and PwC Singapore, \u201cAI Singapore and PwC Singapore collaborate to enhance digital trust competencies through responsible AI | AI Singapore,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.aisingapore.org\/2018\/11\/ai-singapore-and-pwc-singapore-collaborate-to-enhance-digital-trust-competencies-through-responsible-ai\/?highlight=governance (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[49] Government of Canada, \u201cCanada-France Statement on Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.international. gc.ca\/world-monde\/international_relations-relations_internationales\/europe\/2018-06-07-france_ai-ia_france.aspx- ?lang=eng (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[50] Element AI, \u201cElement AI and Mozilla Foundation Partner to Build Data Trusts and Advocate for the Ethical Data Governance of AI | Element AI,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.elementai.com\/press-room\/element-ai-and-mozilla-foundation-partner-to-build-data-trusts-and-advocate-for-the-ethical-data-governance-of-ai (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[51] Algorithmic Justice League and Center on Technology & Privacy at Georgetown Law, \u201cSafe Face Pledge,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.safefacepledge.org\/ (accessed Dec. 07, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[52] Foundation for Responsible Robotics, \u201cFRR Quality Mark for (AI Based) Robotics.\u201d https:\/\/responsiblerobotics. org\/quality-mark\/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[53] Government of Finland, \u201cEnterprises to join in the ethical use of artificial intelligence,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.tekoalyaika.fi\/en\/background\/ethics\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[54] Future of Life Institute, \u201cAn Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons – Future of Life Institute,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/futureoflife.org\/autonomous-weapons-open-letter-2017\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[55] University of Ottawa, \u201cCall for an International Ban on the Weaponization of Artificial Intelligence | Centre for Law, Technology and Society | University of Ottawa,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/techlaw.uottawa.ca\/bankillerai (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[56] NGO Coallition, \u201cThe Campaign To Stop Killer Robots,\u201d website, 2020. https:\/\/www.stopkillerrobots.org\/ (accessed Dec. 07, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[57] Campaign for a commercial-free childhood, \u201cNov. 9. 2015. Advocates Say \u2018Hell No Barbie\u2019 to Stop Mattel from Spying on Kids – Campaign for Commercial Free Childhood,\u201d 2015. https:\/\/commercialfreechildhood.org\/advocatessay-hell-no-barbie-to-stop-mattel-from-spying-on-kids\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[58] Twitter, \u201cSynthetic and manipulated media policy,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/help.twitter.com\/en\/rules-and-policies\/manipulated-media (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[59] K. W. Abbott and D. Snidal, \u201cThe governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state,\u201d Polit. Glob. Regul., vol. 44, pp. 44\u201388, 2009.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[60] K. W. Abbott, G. E. Marchant, and E. A. Corley, \u201cSoft law oversight mechanisms for nanotechnology,\u201d Jurimetrics, pp. 279\u2013312, 2012.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[61] Ada Lovelace Institute, \u201cOur Strategy: 2019-2020,\u201d 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[62] T20, The Future of Work and Education for the Digital Age. 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[63] Amnesty International and Access Now, \u201cThe Toronto Declaration: Protecting the right to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems,\u201d 2018. Accessed: Feb. 01, 2021. [Online]. Available: http:\/\/www.ohchr.org\/ EN\/ProfessionalInterest\/Pages\/Vienna.aspx.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[64] AlgorithmWatch, \u201cThe ADM Manifesto,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/en\/the-adm-manifesto\/ (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[65] Samsung, \u201cArtificial Intelligence | Samsung Research,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/research.samsung.com\/artificial-intelligence (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[66] Sony Corporation, \u201cAI Engagement within Sony Group Sony Group AI Ethics Guidelines,\u201d pp. 1\u20133, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.sony.net\/SonyInfo\/csr_report\/humanrights\/AI_Engagement_within_ Sony_Group.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[67] Telef\u00f3nica, \u201cAI Principles | Our commitments | Responsible Business | Telef\u00f3nica,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.telefonica. com\/en\/web\/responsible-business\/our-commitments\/ai-principles (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[68] S. Pichai, \u201cAI at Google: our principles,\u201d 2018-07-07, p. 1, 2018, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.blog.google\/technology\/ai\/ai-principles\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[69] International Chamber of Commerce, \u201cICC Advertising and Marketing Communications Code,\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[70] Interactive Advertising Bureau, \u201cArtificial Intelligence in Marketing Where Brands and Consumers Meet Through Data,\u201d 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[71] American Medical Association, \u201cH-480.939 Augmented Intelligence in Health Care,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/policysearch. ama-assn.org\/policyfinder\/detail\/augmented intelligence?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-H-480.939.xml (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[72] Association for Computing Machinery, \u201cPrinciples for Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability,\u201d 2017.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[73] Government of Kenya, \u201cEmerging Digital Technologies for Kenya: Exploration & Analysis,\u201d 2019. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.ict.go.ke\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/blockchain.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[74] Government of India, \u201cArtificial Intelligence Task Force,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.aitf.org.in\/ (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[75] Government of Spain, \u201cSpanish RDI Strategy in Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/cpage.mpr.gob.es.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[76] Government of Australia – National Transport Commission (NTC), \u201cChanging driving laws to support automated vehicles,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.ntc.gov.au\/transport-reform\/ntc-projects\/changing-driving-laws-support-AVs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[77] C. I. Gutierrez, G. E. Marchant, and L. Tournas, \u201cLessons for Artificial Intelligence from Historical Uses of Soft Law Governance – A Conclusion,\u201d Jurimetrics, vol. 61, no. 1, 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[78] IBM, \u201cIBM Cognitive Principles,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.ibm.org\/responsibility\/policies#cognitivePrinciples (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[79] Tom Moore, \u201cOur Guiding Principles of Artificial Intelligence at AT&T,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/about.att.com\/innovationblog\/2019\/05\/our_guiding_principles.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[80] Daimler AG, \u201cDaimler Principles for Artificial Intelligence | Daimler > Sustainability > Data,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www. daimler.com\/sustainability\/data\/ki-guidelines.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[81] Tieto, \u201cTieto strengthens commitment to ethical use of AI,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.tietoevry.com\/en\/newsroom\/allnews-and-releases\/press-releases\/2018\/10\/tieto-strengthens-commitment-to-ethical-use-of-ai\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[82] Apple, \u201cOur Approach to Automated Driving System Safety,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.apple.com\/privacy\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[83] Government of Austria, \u201cAutomated – Connected – Mobile.\u201d 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[84] CIFAR, \u201cPan-Canadian AI Strategy,\u201d 2017. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/cifar.ca\/ai\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[85] Government of Germany, Government of France, and Government of Japan, \u201cDFG, German Research Foundation – Trilateral French-Japanese-German Research Projects on Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.dfg.de\/en\/ research_funding\/announcements_proposals\/2019\/info_wissenschaft_19_58\/index.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[86] Government of India, \u201cIndo-French Roadmap on Cybersecurity and Digital Technology (August 22, 2019),\u201d 2019. https:\/\/mea.gov.in\/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl\/31757\/IndoFrench+Roadmap+on+Cybersecurity+and+Digital+Technology+August+22+2019 (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[87] \u201cKarnataka partners with Nasscom for CoE in data science and artificial intelligence – The Hindu BusinessLine,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.thehindubusinessline.com\/info-tech\/karnataka-partners-with-nasscom-for-coe-in-data-science-and-artificial-intelligence\/article9963988.ece (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[88] Center for Explainable and Efficient AI Technologies, \u201cCEE AI,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/cee-ai.org\/cee-ai\/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[89] D. Schrag, \u201cEnsuring Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.belfercenter.org\/publication\/ensuring-responsible-use-artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[90] NEC Group, \u201cNEC Group AI and Human Rights Principles,\u201d NEC Corp., no. 3, pp. 4\u20135, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.nec.com\/en\/press\/201904\/images\/0201-01-01.pdf.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[91] K. Bigelow, \u201cGE Healthcare,\u201d 2018, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.gehealthcare. com\/article\/ethics-in-healthcare-arent-new-but-their-application-has-never-been-more-important\/.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[92] Government of Belgium – Flanders, \u201cFlemish Policy Plan for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.ewi-vlaanderen.be\/nieuws\/vlaams-actieplan-artificiele-intelligentie-gelanceerd (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[93] Government of the European Union, \u201cDeclaration of Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence.\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[94] Government of the UK, \u201cCentre for Data Ethics (CDEI) 2 Year Strategy – GOV.UK,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/the-centre-for-data-ethics-and-innovation-cdei-2- year-strategy\/centre-for-data-ethics-cdei-2-year-strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[95] Government of Singapore, \u201cDigital Government Blueprint,\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[96] The Scottish Government, \u201cIndependent Advisory Group on the Use of Biometric Data in Scotland,\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[97] Huawei, \u201cThinking Ahead About Security and Privacy Protection,\u201d no. September, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/e.huawei.com\/ae\/material\/event\/HC\/87b18e61b7864b5cb186e3dcd6205e7f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[98] Genesys, \u201cIt\u2019s Time to Talk About AI Ethics,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.genesys.com\/blog\/post\/its-time-to-talk-about-aiethics (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[99] SAP, \u201cSAP\u2019s guiding principles for artificial intelligence (AI),\u201d 2018. https:\/\/news.sap.com\/2018\/09\/sap-guiding-principles-for-artificial-intelligence\/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[100] Sidewalk Labs, \u201cMaster Innovation & Development Plan – Digital Innovation Appendix,\u201d Toronto, 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[101] ELISA, \u201cElisa Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/digital-single-market\/en\/news\/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[102] Defense Innovation Board, \u201cAI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense ,\u201d 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[103] IEEE, \u201cThe Ethics Certification Program for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (ECPAIS),\u201d 2019. https:\/\/standards.ieee.org\/industry-connections\/ecpais.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[104] K. Berkler, \u201cWhite paper: Building trust in artificial intelligence – Fraunhofer IAIS.\u201d https:\/\/www.iais.fraunhofer.de\/ en\/press\/press-release-190702.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[105] German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and T\u00dcV S\u00dcD, \u201cT\u00dcV for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.tuvsud.com\/en\/e-ssentials-newsletter\/automotive-essentials\/e-ssentials-1-2018\/tuv-sud-and-dfki-develop-tuv-for-artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[106] For Humanity, \u201cSAFEAI – A Tool For Concerned Parents,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.forhumanity.center\/blogposts\/2017\/7\/18\/safeai-a-tool-for-concerned-parents (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[107] AAAI, \u201cAAAI CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/aaai.org\/Conferences\/ code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[108] R. E. Anderson, \u201cACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,\u201d Commun. ACM, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 94\u201399, 1992, doi: 10.1145\/129875.129885.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[109] P. Grindrod and J. Bernab\u00e9 Moreno, \u201cCode of conduct – Oxford Munich Code of Conduct,\u201d 2018. http:\/\/www. code-of-ethics.org\/code-of-conduct\/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[110] Telef\u00f3nica Deutschland, \u201cFocused on People: Telef\u00f3nica Deutschland declares six ethical principles regarding
artificial intelligence | Telef\u00f3nica Deutschland,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.telefonica.de\/news\/press-releases-telefonica-germany\/2019\/02\/focused-on-people-telefonica-deutschland-declares-six-ethical-principles-regarding-artificial-intelligence.html
(accessed Dec. 16, 2020).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[111] Kogniz, \u201cCode of conduct.\u201d https:\/\/www.kogniz.com\/code-of-conduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[112] HireVue, \u201cBias, AI ethics and the HireVue approach,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.hirevue.com\/why-hirevue\/ai-ethics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[113] Axon, \u201cSecond Report of the Axon AI & Policing Technology Ethics Board: Automated License Plate Readers,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[114] Axon, \u201cFirst report of the axon ai & policing technology ethics board,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/static1.squarespace.com\/static\/58a33e881b631bc60d4f8b31\/t\/5d13d7e1990c4f00014c0aeb\/1561581540954\/Axon_Ethics_Board_First_Report.pdfhttps:\/www.policingproject.org\/axon. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[115] Government of Denmark, \u201cNational Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/niti.gov.in\/writereaddata\/files\/document_publication\/NationalStrategy-for-AI-Discussion-Paper.pdf. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[116] Government of Lithuania, \u201cLithuanian Artificial Intelligence Strategy: A Vision of the Future,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[117] Government of Japan, \u201cSocial Principles of Human-Centric AI,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[118] Government of Finland, \u201cFinland\u2019s Age of Artificial Intelligence: Turning Finland into a leading country in the application of artificial intelligence Objective and recommendations for measures,\u201d 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[119] Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, \u201cEesti tehisintellekti kasutuselev\u00f5tu eksperdir\u00fchma aruanne (Estonian Artificial Intelligence: Report of the Expert Group on Deployment),\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.riigikantselei.ee\/sites\/default\/files\/riigikantselei\/strateegiaburoo\/eesti_tehisintellekti_kasutuselevotu_eksperdiruhma_aruanne.pdf<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[120] Government of Russia, \u201cDecree of the President of the Russian Federation on the Development ,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[121] The Partnership on AI, \u201cAbout – The Partnership on AI.\u201d https:\/\/www.partnershiponai.org\/about\/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[122] BDVA and euRobotics, \u201cJoint Vision Paper for an Artificial Intelligence Public Private Partnership (AI PPP) ,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.eu-robotics.net\/sparc\/upload\/Monitoring-report-2017-final-SPARC-2018_5v0-with-annexes.pdf. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[123] Digital Catapult and Machine Intelligence Garage, \u201cEthics Framework,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.migarage.ai\/ethics\/ ethics-framework\/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[124] American Academy of Sleep Medicine, \u201cArtificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine Committee,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/aasm. org\/membership\/volunteer\/committees-current\/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[125] American Society of Neuroradiology, \u201cArtificial Intelligence Task Force,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.asnr.org\/research\/ asnr-study-groups\/artificial-intelligence\/artificial-intelligence-task-force\/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[126] Council of Europe, \u201cUnboxing artificial intelligence: 10 steps to protect human rights,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.coe. int\/en\/web\/commissioner\/-\/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights (accessed Feb. 02, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[127] American Civil Liberties Union, \u201cAn Ethical Framework for Facial Recognition,\u201d 2014. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[128] J. R. Geis et al., \u201cEthics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement,\u201d Radiology, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 436\u2013440, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1148\/radiol.2019191586. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[129] Green Digital Working Group, \u201cPosition on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2016. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[130] Chinese Academy of Sciences and Institute of Automation, \u201cHarmonious Artificial Intelligence Principles,\u201d 2018. http:\/\/bii.ia.ac.cn\/hai\/ (accessed Feb. 02, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[131] European Parliament, \u201cA comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics – Tuesday, 12 February 2019,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.europarl.europa.eu\/doceo\/document\/TA-8-2019-0081_EN.html (accessed Feb. 02, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[132] Solita, \u201cHow to navigate the ethical challenges of using AI in business and society The Impact of AI,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[133] Sage, \u201cThe Ethics of Code: Developing AI for Business with Five Core Principles,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.sage. com\/~\/media\/group\/files\/business-builders\/business-builders-ethics-of-code.pdf (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[134] Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion, \u201cUse of Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/ www2.deloitte.com\/insights\/us\/en\/focus\/human-capital-trends\/2017\/predictive-hiring-talent-acquisition.html. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[135] European Commission, \u201cThe future of work? Work of the future! ,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/digital-single-market\/en\/news\/future-work-work-future (accessed Feb. 02, 2021)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[136] Cisco, \u201cHuman Rights Position Statements,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/webcache.googleusercontent.com\/search?q=- cache:j6yTEbYdcMkJ:https:\/\/www.cisco.com\/c\/dam\/assets\/csr\/pdf\/Human-Rights-Position-Statements-2018.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[137] Internet Society, \u201cArtificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Policy Paper,\u201d 2017. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Artificial_intelligence. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[138] Department of Health Abu Dhabi, \u201cThe AI Lab.\u201d [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.doh.gov.ae\/ai-assets\/doc\/ai-labplaybook-v13-print.pdf. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[139] Salesforce, \u201cEthics – Salesforce Research.\u201d https:\/\/einstein.ai\/ethics (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[140] Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things in Smart Sustainable Cities in Latin America, \u201cThe Buenos Aires Declaration,\u201d 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[141] Council of the European Union, \u201cThematic Reviews on \u2018Social Aspects of Digitalisation\u2019 (SPC) and \u2018Digitalisation and Robotisation of Work\u2019 (EMCO) – Endorsement of the joint key messages,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/data.consilium.europa. eu\/doc\/document\/ST-14411-2018-INIT\/en\/pdf (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[142] Starbutter, \u201cEthics and Principles.\u201d https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20201124121357\/https:\/\/www.starbutter.com\/ ethics-and-principles (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[143] Government of the UK and Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, \u201cDeepfakes and Audiovisual Disinformation,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/cdei-publishes-its-first-series-of-three-snapshot-papers-ethical-issues-in-ai\/snapshot-paper-deepfakes-and-audiovisual-disinformation (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[144] D. Tarraf et al., The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence: Assessment and Recommendations. RAND Corporation, 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[145] Government of Mauritius, \u201cMauritius Artificial Intelligence Strategy,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/mitci.govmu.org\/Documents\/ Strategies\/Mauritius AI Strategy.pdf#search=Ai strategy (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[146] Computing Community Consortium, \u201cAI Roadmap – 5. Recommendations,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/cra.org\/ccc\/ai-roadmap-recommendations\/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[147] Ethicsnet, \u201cDataset on Ethics.\u201d [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.ethicsnet.org\/about. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[148] IA Latam, \u201cStatement of Ethics for the Design, Development, and Use of Artificial Intelligence.\u201d [Online]. Available: https:\/\/ia-latam.com\/etica-ia-latam\/. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[149] IEEE, \u201cEthics In Action in Autonomous and Intelligent Systems,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/ethicsinaction.ieee.org\/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[150] Government of the European Union, \u201cPolicy and Investment Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2019. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/newsroom\/dae\/document.cfm?doc_id=60343.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[151] Government of the Republic of Korea, \u201cMid- to Long-Term Master Plan in Preparation for the Intelligent Information Society,\u201d 2016. [Online]. Available: http:\/\/www.msip.go.kr\/dynamic\/file\/afieldfile\/msse56\/1352869\/2017\/07\/20\/ Master Plan for the intelligent information society.pdf. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[152] British Standards Institution, \u201cRobots and robotic devices: Guide to the ethical design and application of robots and robotic systems,\u201d 2016. https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/0B0McUk5vAotHcDYzbzh2Y0c4aUE\/view (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[153] PATH, \u201cDevelops Ethical Guidelines on the Use of AI in Healthcare,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/ news-releases\/path-develops-ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-ai-in-healthcare-300882699.html (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[154] Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, \u201cArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[155] International Organization for Standardization, \u201cISO – IEC\/TR 60601-4-1:2017 – Medical electrical equipment \u2014 Part 4-1: Guidance and interpretation \u2014 Medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems employing a degree of autonomy,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/70755.html?browse=tc (accessed Feb. 03, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[156] European Parliament, \u201cTexts adopted – Civil Law Rules on Robotics – Thursday, 16 February 2017,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/ www.europarl.europa.eu\/doceo\/document\/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html?redirect (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[157] EPSRC, \u201cPrinciples of robotics – EPSRC,\u201d 2010. https:\/\/epsrc.ukri.org\/research\/ourportfolio\/themes\/engineering\/activities\/principlesofrobotics\/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[158] Rathenau Instituut, \u201cHuman rights in the robot age: Challenges arising from the use of robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual and augmented reality Report,\u201d 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[159] International Chamber of Commerce, \u201cICC Policy Statement on Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2018. http:\/\/www.iccindiaonline.org\/ps2019\/1.pdf (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[160] FAT\/ML, \u201cPrinciples for Accountable Algorithms and a Social Impact Statement for Algorithms,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/ www.fatml.org\/resources\/principles-for-accountable-algorithms (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[161] Government of Australia, \u201cArtificial Intelligence: Australia\u2019s Ethics Framework,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/consult.industry.gov.au\/. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[162] International Biometrics & Identification Association, \u201cIBIA Privacy Best Practice Recommendations for Commercial Biometric Use,\u201d 2014. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ibia.org. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[163] IBM, \u201cData Responsibility at IBM,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.ibm.com\/blogs\/policy\/dataresponsibility-at-ibm\/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[164] Government of Japan, \u201cReport on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society Unofficial translation Advisory Board on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society,\u201d 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[165] UNESCO, \u201cSteering AI and advanced ICTs for knowledge societies: a Rights, Openness, Access, and Multi-stakeholder Perspective,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/unesdoc.unesco.org\/ark:\/48223\/pf0000372132 (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[166] Government of Sweden, Artificial Intelligence in Swedish Business and Society: Analysis of Development and Potential. 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[167] Government of Taiwan, \u201cAI Taiwan,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/ai.taiwan.gov.tw\/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[168] U. and D. A. I. Toward a Controlled, \u201cToward a Controlled, Useful and Demystified Artificial Intelligence,\u201d 2017. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.senat.fr. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[169] Business for Social Responsibility, \u201cArtificial Intelligence: A Rights-Based Blueprint for Business,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/ www.bsr.org\/en\/our-insights\/report-view\/artificial-intelligence-a-rights-based-blueprint-for-business (accessed Feb. 04, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[170] Alliance for Multilateralism, \u201cDeclaration by the Alliance for Multilateralism on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS),\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[171] E. Palmerini et al., \u201cRoboLaw Grant Agreement number: 289092 Project acronym: RoboLaw Project title: Regulating Emerging Robotic Technologies in Europe: Robotics facing Law and Ethics Funding scheme: Collaborative project (CP), FP7-SiS-Challenge 1-3: Regulating emerging scientific and technological developments D6.2 Guidelines on Regulating Robotics,\u201d 2014. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.robolaw.eu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[172] Government of India, \u201cReport of Committee – D: On Cyber Security, Safety, and Ethical Issues,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[173] E. Chavannes and A. Arkhipov-Goyal, \u201cThe Ethics of Robotic and Autonomous Systems in a Military Context,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[174] Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, \u201cArtificial Intelligence: An Evangelical Statement of Principles.\u201d https:\/\/ erlc.com\/resource-library\/statements\/artificial-intelligence-an-evangelical-statement-of-principles. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[175] Government of Canada, \u201cResponsible AI in the Government of Canada.\u201d https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1Sn-qBZUXEUG4dVk909eSg5qvfbpNlRhzIefWPtBwbxY\/edit# (accessed Dec. 07, 2020). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[176] UNICRI, \u201cUnited Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute,\u201d 2019. http:\/\/www.unicri.it\/in_focus\/on\/interpol_unicri_report_ai (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[177] Isle of Man Government, \u201cCode of Practice for the testing of autonomous vehicles,\u201d 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[178] Universit\u00e9 de Montr\u00e9al, \u201cDeclaration of Montr\u00e9al for a responsible development of AI,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com\/ (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[179] Microsoft Corporation, \u201cHealthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Data and Ethics – A 2030 Vision,\u201d 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[180] Government of Canada, \u201cResponsible AI in the Government of Canada,\u201d 2018. https:\/\/docs.google.com\/document\/d\/1Sn-qBZUXEUG4dVk909eSg5qvfbpNlRhzIefWPtBwbxY\/edit (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[181] Government of Japan, \u201cDraft AI Utilization Principles,\u201d 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[182] Foundation for Responsible Robotics, \u201cFRR Quality Mark for (AI Based) Robotics – Responsible Robotics,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/responsiblerobotics.org\/quality-mark\/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[183] Government of Malta, \u201cMalta: Towards Trustworthy AI,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/malta.ai\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/10\/ Malta_Towards_Ethical_and_Trustworthy_AI_vFINAL.pdf (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[184] Council of Europe, \u201cGuidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection,\u201d 2019. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:\/\/www.coe.int\/en\/web\/human-rights-rule-of-law\/artificial-intelligence\/glossary: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[185] Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute International Association of Chiefs of Police, \u201cLaw Enforcement Facial Recognition Use Case Catalog,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[186] Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the National Science & Technology Council, \u201cThe National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan: 2019 Update,\u201d 2019. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[187] United Nations, \u201cReport of the Working Party on Road Traffic Safety on its seventy-fourth session Contents,\u201d 2017. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[188] ANSI UASSC, \u201cStandardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems,\u201d 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[189] Government of the UK, \u201cAI Sector Deal,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/artificial-intelligence-sector-deal\/ai-sector-deal (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[190] International Organization for Standardization, \u201cIntelligent transport systems \u2014 Assisted parking system (APS) \u2014 Performance requirements and test procedures,\u201d 2017. https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/73768.html?browse=tc (accessed Feb. 05, 2021). <\/p>\n\n\n\n

[191] BusinessEurope, \u201cArtificial Intelligence recommendations,\u201d 2019. https:\/\/www.businesseurope.eu\/publications\/ artificial-intelligence-recommendations (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n