References

[1] J. Fjeld, N. Achten, H. Hilligoss, A. Nagy, and M. Srikumar, “Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI,” SSRN Electron. J., Feb. 2020, doi: 10.2139/ ssrn.3518482.

[2] A. Jobin, M. Ienca, and E. Vayena, “The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines,” Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 389–399, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

[3] Z. Munn, M. D. J. Peters, C. Stern, C. Tufanaru, A. McArthur, and E. Aromataris, “Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach,” BMC Med. Res. Methodol., vol. 18, no. 1, p. 143, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.

[4] H. Arksey and L. O’Malley, “Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theory Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616.

[5] S. Anderson, P. Allen, S. Peckham, and N. Goodwin, “Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services,” Health Research Policy and Systems, vol. 6, no. 1. BioMed Central, p. 7, Jul. 09, 2008, doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7.

[6] G. Marchant, “‘Soft Law’ Governance Of Artificial Intelligence.” AI Pulse, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://aipulse.org/soft-law-governance-of-artificial-intelligence/.

[7] G. Marchant, L. Tournas, and C. I. Gutierrez, “Governing Emerging Technologies Through Soft Law: Lessons for Artificial Intelligence,” Jurimetrics, vol. 61, no. 1, 2021.

[8] G. E. Marchant and B. Allenby, “Soft law: New tools for governing emerging technologies,” Bull. At. Sci., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 108–114, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1080/00963402.2017.1288447.

[9] S. Russell and P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson, 2014.

[10] S. Legg and M. Hutter, “A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence,” Jun. 2007, Accessed: Jan. 09, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3639.

[11] OECD.AI, “The OECD Artificial Intelligence Policy Observatory,” 2020, 2020. https://oecd.ai/ (accessed Dec. 14, 2020).

[12] Algorithm Watch, “AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory,” Algorithm Watch, vol. 2019, pp. 1–9, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 14, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/.

[13] AI Ethicist, “Ethical AI,” 2021. https://www.aiethicist.org/ (accessed Jan. 10, 2021).

[14] T. Lysaght, H. Y. Lim, V. Xafis, and K. Y. Ngiam, “AI-Assisted Decision-making in Healthcare: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research,” Asian Bioeth. Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 299–314, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s41649-019-00096-0.

[15] C. J. Kelly, A. Karthikesalingam, M. Suleyman, G. Corrado, and D. King, “Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence,” BMC Medicine, vol. 17, no. 1. BioMed Central Ltd., p. 195, Oct. 29, 2019, doi: 10.1186/ s12916-019-1426-2.

[16] M. Perc, M. Ozer, and J. Hojnik, “Social and Juristic Challenges of Artificial Intelligence,” Palgrave Communications, vol. 5, no. 1. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., pp. 1–7, Dec. 01, 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41599-019-0278-x

[17] INDIGENOUS AI, “Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence Working Group.” http://www.indigenous-ai. net/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[18] Finn AI, “3 Ethical Considerations When Implementing AI For Your Bank – Finn AI.” https://www.finn.ai/ethics-ofai-in-banking/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[19] Force 11, “Guiding Principles for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable Data Publishing version b1.0.” https://www.force11.org/fairprinciples (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[20] National Police Foundation, “National Police Foundation Publishes Best Practices Guide for Police Open Data.” https://www.policefoundation.org/national-police-foundation-publishes-best-practices-guide-for-police-open-data/ (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[21] Philips, “Five guiding principles for responsible use of AI in healthcare and healthy living – Blog.” https://www. philips.com/a-w/about/news/archive/blogs/innovation-matters/2020/20200121-five-guiding-principles-for-responsibleuse-of-ai-in-healthcare-and-healthy-living.html (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[22] Government of Norway, “National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,” 2020. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.regjeringen.no/ki-strategi,.

[22] Government of Norway, “National Strategy for Artificial Intell[23] Sipri, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Strategic Stability and Nuclear Risk,” 2019. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.sipri.org.

[24] Women Leading in AI, “10 Principles of Responsible AI.” http://womenleadinginai.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/WLiAI-Report-2019.pdf (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[25] M. Gelles, A. Mirkow, and J. Mariani, “The future of law enforcement Policing strategies to meet the challenges of evolving technology and a changing world.

[26] Booz Allen Hamilton, “4 Ways to Preserve Privacy in Artificial Intelligence.” https://www.boozallen.com/s/solution/four-ways-to-preserve-privacy-in-ai.html (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[27] Ernst & Young, “How AI can be a force for good in government | EY – Global.” https://www.ey.com/en_gl/consulting/how-ai-can-be-a-force-for-good-in-government (accessed Jan. 11, 2021).

[28] World Bank, “World Bank Country and Lending Groups,” The World Bank. 2020, Accessed: Dec. 28, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups.

[29] OECD, “Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence.” 2019, doi: 10.1017/ilm.2020.5.

[30] AI Forum – New Zeland, “Artificial Intelligence for Agriculture in New Zealand,” 2019. https://aiforum.org.nz/reports/ai-for-agriculture-in-new-zealand/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[31] Government of Luxembourg, “Artificial Intelligence: opportunities, risks and recommendations for the financial sector,” 2018.

[32] S. Pichai, “AI at Google: our principles,” 2018-07-07, p. 1, 2018, Accessed: Dec. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/.

[33] Deutsche Telekom, “Digital Ethics Guidelines on AI,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.telekom.com/resource/blob/544510/ca70d6697d35ba60fbcb29aeef4529e8/dl-181008-digitale-ethik-en-data.pdf.

[34] Graham Webster, Rogier Creemers, Paul Triolo, and Elsa Kania, “Full Translation: China’s ‘New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan’ (2017),” 2017. https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/ full-translation-chinas-new-generation-artificial-intelligence-development-plan-2017/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[35] Government of Japan, “New Robot Strategy: Japan’s Robot Strategy,” 2015. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2015/pdf/0123_01b.pdf.

[36] European Commission, “The Age of Artificial Intelligence: Towards a European Strategy for Human-Centric Machines | JRC Science Hub Communities,” 2018. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ communities/en/community/digitranscope/document/age-artificial-intelligence-towards-european-strategy-human-centric.

[37] International Association of Privacy Professionals, “White Paper – Building Ethics into Privacy Frameworks for Big Data and AI,” 2018. https://iapp.org/resources/article/building-ethics-into-privacy-frameworks-for-big-data-and-ai/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[38] European Commission, “COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS: A European strategy on Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems, a milestone towards cooperative, connected and automated mobility,” 2016. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX- %3A52016DC0766&from=EN.

[39] Samsung Research, “Principles for AI Ethics.” https://research.samsung.com/artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).

[40] Microsoft, “Responsible AI Principles from Microsoft,” 2020. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/responsible-ai?activetab=pivot1%3Aprimaryr6.

[41] OpenAI, “About OpenAI.” 2019, [Online]. Available: https://openai.com/about/.

[42] Association of Computing Machinery, “Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” 2018. https://www.acm.org/ code-of-ethics (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[43] Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, “CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT,” 2018. https://www.aaai.org/Conferences/code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[44] Society of Actuaries, “Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Actuaries 2 Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence for Actuaries,” 2019.

[45] Digital Signage Federation, “Digital Signage Privacy Standards,” 2011. Accessed: Jan. 29, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/02/P085400behavadreport.pdf.

[46] Appen, “Appen Announces Crowd Code of Ethics to Build Better AI | Appen,” 2019. https://appen.com/blog/ appen-announces-crowd-code-of-ethics-to-build-better-ai/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[47] Kogniz, “Code of conduct.” https://web.archive.org/web/20200614133201/https://www.kogniz.com/code-ofconduct (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[48] AI Singapore and PwC Singapore, “AI Singapore and PwC Singapore collaborate to enhance digital trust competencies through responsible AI | AI Singapore,” 2018. https://www.aisingapore.org/2018/11/ai-singapore-and-pwc-singapore-collaborate-to-enhance-digital-trust-competencies-through-responsible-ai/?highlight=governance (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[49] Government of Canada, “Canada-France Statement on Artificial Intelligence,” 2018. https://www.international. gc.ca/world-monde/international_relations-relations_internationales/europe/2018-06-07-france_ai-ia_france.aspx- ?lang=eng (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[50] Element AI, “Element AI and Mozilla Foundation Partner to Build Data Trusts and Advocate for the Ethical Data Governance of AI | Element AI,” 2019. https://www.elementai.com/press-room/element-ai-and-mozilla-foundation-partner-to-build-data-trusts-and-advocate-for-the-ethical-data-governance-of-ai (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[51] Algorithmic Justice League and Center on Technology & Privacy at Georgetown Law, “Safe Face Pledge,” 2018. https://www.safefacepledge.org/ (accessed Dec. 07, 2020).

[52] Foundation for Responsible Robotics, “FRR Quality Mark for (AI Based) Robotics.” https://responsiblerobotics. org/quality-mark/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).

[53] Government of Finland, “Enterprises to join in the ethical use of artificial intelligence,” 2018. https://www.tekoalyaika.fi/en/background/ethics/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[54] Future of Life Institute, “An Open Letter to the United Nations Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons – Future of Life Institute,” 2017. https://futureoflife.org/autonomous-weapons-open-letter-2017/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[55] University of Ottawa, “Call for an International Ban on the Weaponization of Artificial Intelligence | Centre for Law, Technology and Society | University of Ottawa,” 2017. https://techlaw.uottawa.ca/bankillerai (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[56] NGO Coallition, “The Campaign To Stop Killer Robots,” website, 2020. https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/ (accessed Dec. 07, 2020).

[57] Campaign for a commercial-free childhood, “Nov. 9. 2015. Advocates Say ‘Hell No Barbie’ to Stop Mattel from Spying on Kids – Campaign for Commercial Free Childhood,” 2015. https://commercialfreechildhood.org/advocatessay-hell-no-barbie-to-stop-mattel-from-spying-on-kids/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[58] Twitter, “Synthetic and manipulated media policy,” 2019. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/manipulated-media (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[59] K. W. Abbott and D. Snidal, “The governance triangle: Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state,” Polit. Glob. Regul., vol. 44, pp. 44–88, 2009.

[60] K. W. Abbott, G. E. Marchant, and E. A. Corley, “Soft law oversight mechanisms for nanotechnology,” Jurimetrics, pp. 279–312, 2012.

[61] Ada Lovelace Institute, “Our Strategy: 2019-2020,” 2019.

[62] T20, The Future of Work and Education for the Digital Age. 2018.

[63] Amnesty International and Access Now, “The Toronto Declaration: Protecting the right to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems,” 2018. Accessed: Feb. 01, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/ EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx.

[64] AlgorithmWatch, “The ADM Manifesto,” 2019. https://algorithmwatch.org/en/the-adm-manifesto/ (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).

[65] Samsung, “Artificial Intelligence | Samsung Research,” 2019. https://research.samsung.com/artificial-intelligence (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[66] Sony Corporation, “AI Engagement within Sony Group Sony Group AI Ethics Guidelines,” pp. 1–3, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/csr_report/humanrights/AI_Engagement_within_ Sony_Group.pdf.

[67] Telefónica, “AI Principles | Our commitments | Responsible Business | Telefónica,” 2018. https://www.telefonica. com/en/web/responsible-business/our-commitments/ai-principles (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[68] S. Pichai, “AI at Google: our principles,” 2018-07-07, p. 1, 2018, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles/.

[69] International Chamber of Commerce, “ICC Advertising and Marketing Communications Code,” 2018.

[70] Interactive Advertising Bureau, “Artificial Intelligence in Marketing Where Brands and Consumers Meet Through Data,” 2019.

[71] American Medical Association, “H-480.939 Augmented Intelligence in Health Care,” 2019. https://policysearch. ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/augmented intelligence?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-H-480.939.xml (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).

[72] Association for Computing Machinery, “Principles for Algorithmic Transparency and Accountability,” 2017.

[73] Government of Kenya, “Emerging Digital Technologies for Kenya: Exploration & Analysis,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.ict.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/blockchain.pdf.

[74] Government of India, “Artificial Intelligence Task Force,” 2018. https://www.aitf.org.in/ (accessed Feb. 01, 2021).

[75] Government of Spain, “Spanish RDI Strategy in Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cpage.mpr.gob.es.

[76] Government of Australia – National Transport Commission (NTC), “Changing driving laws to support automated vehicles,” 2018. https://www.ntc.gov.au/transport-reform/ntc-projects/changing-driving-laws-support-AVs.

[77] C. I. Gutierrez, G. E. Marchant, and L. Tournas, “Lessons for Artificial Intelligence from Historical Uses of Soft Law Governance – A Conclusion,” Jurimetrics, vol. 61, no. 1, 2021.

[78] IBM, “IBM Cognitive Principles,” 2017. https://www.ibm.org/responsibility/policies#cognitivePrinciples (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[79] Tom Moore, “Our Guiding Principles of Artificial Intelligence at AT&T,” 2019. https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2019/05/our_guiding_principles.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[80] Daimler AG, “Daimler Principles for Artificial Intelligence | Daimler > Sustainability > Data,” 2019. https://www. daimler.com/sustainability/data/ki-guidelines.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[81] Tieto, “Tieto strengthens commitment to ethical use of AI,” 2018. https://www.tietoevry.com/en/newsroom/allnews-and-releases/press-releases/2018/10/tieto-strengthens-commitment-to-ethical-use-of-ai/.

[82] Apple, “Our Approach to Automated Driving System Safety,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.apple.com/privacy/.

[83] Government of Austria, “Automated – Connected – Mobile.” 2016.

[84] CIFAR, “Pan-Canadian AI Strategy,” 2017. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cifar.ca/ai/.

[85] Government of Germany, Government of France, and Government of Japan, “DFG, German Research Foundation – Trilateral French-Japanese-German Research Projects on Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. https://www.dfg.de/en/ research_funding/announcements_proposals/2019/info_wissenschaft_19_58/index.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[86] Government of India, “Indo-French Roadmap on Cybersecurity and Digital Technology (August 22, 2019),” 2019. https://mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/31757/IndoFrench+Roadmap+on+Cybersecurity+and+Digital+Technology+August+22+2019 (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[87] “Karnataka partners with Nasscom for CoE in data science and artificial intelligence – The Hindu BusinessLine,” 2018. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/karnataka-partners-with-nasscom-for-coe-in-data-science-and-artificial-intelligence/article9963988.ece (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[88] Center for Explainable and Efficient AI Technologies, “CEE AI,” 2019. https://cee-ai.org/cee-ai/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[89] D. Schrag, “Ensuring Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence | Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs,” 2018. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/ensuring-responsible-use-artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[90] NEC Group, “NEC Group AI and Human Rights Principles,” NEC Corp., no. 3, pp. 4–5, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nec.com/en/press/201904/images/0201-01-01.pdf.

[91] K. Bigelow, “GE Healthcare,” 2018, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.gehealthcare. com/article/ethics-in-healthcare-arent-new-but-their-application-has-never-been-more-important/.

[92] Government of Belgium – Flanders, “Flemish Policy Plan for Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. https://www.ewi-vlaanderen.be/nieuws/vlaams-actieplan-artificiele-intelligentie-gelanceerd (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[93] Government of the European Union, “Declaration of Cooperation on Artificial Intelligence.” 2018.

[94] Government of the UK, “Centre for Data Ethics (CDEI) 2 Year Strategy – GOV.UK,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-centre-for-data-ethics-and-innovation-cdei-2- year-strategy/centre-for-data-ethics-cdei-2-year-strategy.

[95] Government of Singapore, “Digital Government Blueprint,” 2018.

[96] The Scottish Government, “Independent Advisory Group on the Use of Biometric Data in Scotland,” 2018.

[97] Huawei, “Thinking Ahead About Security and Privacy Protection,” no. September, 2019, Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://e.huawei.com/ae/material/event/HC/87b18e61b7864b5cb186e3dcd6205e7f.

[98] Genesys, “It’s Time to Talk About AI Ethics,” 2018. https://www.genesys.com/blog/post/its-time-to-talk-about-aiethics (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[99] SAP, “SAP’s guiding principles for artificial intelligence (AI),” 2018. https://news.sap.com/2018/09/sap-guiding-principles-for-artificial-intelligence/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).

[100] Sidewalk Labs, “Master Innovation & Development Plan – Digital Innovation Appendix,” Toronto, 2019.

[101] ELISA, “Elisa Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/definition-artificial-intelligence-main-capabilities-.

[102] Defense Innovation Board, “AI Principles: Recommendations on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence by the Department of Defense ,” 2019.

[103] IEEE, “The Ethics Certification Program for Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (ECPAIS),” 2019. https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ecpais.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[104] K. Berkler, “White paper: Building trust in artificial intelligence – Fraunhofer IAIS.” https://www.iais.fraunhofer.de/ en/press/press-release-190702.html (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[105] German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence and TÜV SÜD, “TÜV for Artificial Intelligence,” 2018. https://www.tuvsud.com/en/e-ssentials-newsletter/automotive-essentials/e-ssentials-1-2018/tuv-sud-and-dfki-develop-tuv-for-artificial-intelligence (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[106] For Humanity, “SAFEAI – A Tool For Concerned Parents,” 2017. https://www.forhumanity.center/blogposts/2017/7/18/safeai-a-tool-for-concerned-parents (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[107] AAAI, “AAAI CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT,” 2019. https://aaai.org/Conferences/ code-of-ethics-and-conduct.php (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).

[108] R. E. Anderson, “ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct,” Commun. ACM, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 94–99, 1992, doi: 10.1145/129875.129885.

[109] P. Grindrod and J. Bernabé Moreno, “Code of conduct – Oxford Munich Code of Conduct,” 2018. http://www. code-of-ethics.org/code-of-conduct/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[110] Telefónica Deutschland, “Focused on People: Telefónica Deutschland declares six ethical principles regarding
artificial intelligence | Telefónica Deutschland,” 2019. https://www.telefonica.de/news/press-releases-telefonica-germany/2019/02/focused-on-people-telefonica-deutschland-declares-six-ethical-principles-regarding-artificial-intelligence.html
(accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[111] Kogniz, “Code of conduct.” https://www.kogniz.com/code-of-conduct.

[112] HireVue, “Bias, AI ethics and the HireVue approach,” 2019. https://www.hirevue.com/why-hirevue/ai-ethics.

[113] Axon, “Second Report of the Axon AI & Policing Technology Ethics Board: Automated License Plate Readers,” 2019.

[114] Axon, “First report of the axon ai & policing technology ethics board,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58a33e881b631bc60d4f8b31/t/5d13d7e1990c4f00014c0aeb/1561581540954/Axon_Ethics_Board_First_Report.pdfhttps:/www.policingproject.org/axon.

[115] Government of Denmark, “National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/NationalStrategy-for-AI-Discussion-Paper.pdf.

[116] Government of Lithuania, “Lithuanian Artificial Intelligence Strategy: A Vision of the Future,” 2019.

[117] Government of Japan, “Social Principles of Human-Centric AI,” 2019.

[118] Government of Finland, “Finland’s Age of Artificial Intelligence: Turning Finland into a leading country in the application of artificial intelligence Objective and recommendations for measures,” 2017.

[119] Estonian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, “Eesti tehisintellekti kasutuselevõtu eksperdirühma aruanne (Estonian Artificial Intelligence: Report of the Expert Group on Deployment),” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.riigikantselei.ee/sites/default/files/riigikantselei/strateegiaburoo/eesti_tehisintellekti_kasutuselevotu_eksperdiruhma_aruanne.pdf

[120] Government of Russia, “Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on the Development ,” 2019.

[121] The Partnership on AI, “About – The Partnership on AI.” https://www.partnershiponai.org/about/ (accessed Dec. 15, 2020).

[122] BDVA and euRobotics, “Joint Vision Paper for an Artificial Intelligence Public Private Partnership (AI PPP) ,” 2019. Accessed: Dec. 16, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.eu-robotics.net/sparc/upload/Monitoring-report-2017-final-SPARC-2018_5v0-with-annexes.pdf.

[123] Digital Catapult and Machine Intelligence Garage, “Ethics Framework,” 2018. https://www.migarage.ai/ethics/ ethics-framework/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[124] American Academy of Sleep Medicine, “Artificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine Committee,” 2019. https://aasm. org/membership/volunteer/committees-current/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[125] American Society of Neuroradiology, “Artificial Intelligence Task Force,” 2019. https://www.asnr.org/research/ asnr-study-groups/artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-task-force/ (accessed Dec. 16, 2020).

[126] Council of Europe, “Unboxing artificial intelligence: 10 steps to protect human rights,” 2019. https://www.coe. int/en/web/commissioner/-/unboxing-artificial-intelligence-10-steps-to-protect-human-rights (accessed Feb. 02, 2021).

[127] American Civil Liberties Union, “An Ethical Framework for Facial Recognition,” 2014.

[128] J. R. Geis et al., “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Summary of the Joint European and North American Multisociety Statement,” Radiology, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. 436–440, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191586.

[129] Green Digital Working Group, “Position on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence,” 2016.

[130] Chinese Academy of Sciences and Institute of Automation, “Harmonious Artificial Intelligence Principles,” 2018. http://bii.ia.ac.cn/hai/ (accessed Feb. 02, 2021).

[131] European Parliament, “A comprehensive European industrial policy on artificial intelligence and robotics – Tuesday, 12 February 2019,” 2019. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0081_EN.html (accessed Feb. 02, 2021).

[132] Solita, “How to navigate the ethical challenges of using AI in business and society The Impact of AI,” 2019.

[133] Sage, “The Ethics of Code: Developing AI for Business with Five Core Principles,” 2017. https://www.sage. com/~/media/group/files/business-builders/business-builders-ethics-of-code.pdf (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[134] Employer Assistance and Resource Network on Disability Inclusion, “Use of Artificial Intelligence to Facilitate Employment Opportunities for People with Disabilities,” 2019. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https:// www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/human-capital-trends/2017/predictive-hiring-talent-acquisition.html.

[135] European Commission, “The future of work? Work of the future! ,” 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/future-work-work-future (accessed Feb. 02, 2021)

[136] Cisco, “Human Rights Position Statements,” 2018. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=- cache:j6yTEbYdcMkJ:https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/assets/csr/pdf/Human-Rights-Position-Statements-2018.pdf+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[137] Internet Society, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Policy Paper,” 2017. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence.

[138] Department of Health Abu Dhabi, “The AI Lab.” [Online]. Available: https://www.doh.gov.ae/ai-assets/doc/ai-labplaybook-v13-print.pdf.

[139] Salesforce, “Ethics – Salesforce Research.” https://einstein.ai/ethics (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[140] Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things in Smart Sustainable Cities in Latin America, “The Buenos Aires Declaration,” 2018.

[141] Council of the European Union, “Thematic Reviews on ‘Social Aspects of Digitalisation’ (SPC) and ‘Digitalisation and Robotisation of Work’ (EMCO) – Endorsement of the joint key messages,” 2018. https://data.consilium.europa. eu/doc/document/ST-14411-2018-INIT/en/pdf (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[142] Starbutter, “Ethics and Principles.” https://web.archive.org/web/20201124121357/https://www.starbutter.com/ ethics-and-principles (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[143] Government of the UK and Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, “Deepfakes and Audiovisual Disinformation,” 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cdei-publishes-its-first-series-of-three-snapshot-papers-ethical-issues-in-ai/snapshot-paper-deepfakes-and-audiovisual-disinformation (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[144] D. Tarraf et al., The Department of Defense Posture for Artificial Intelligence: Assessment and Recommendations. RAND Corporation, 2019.

[145] Government of Mauritius, “Mauritius Artificial Intelligence Strategy,” 2018. https://mitci.govmu.org/Documents/ Strategies/Mauritius AI Strategy.pdf#search=Ai strategy (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[146] Computing Community Consortium, “AI Roadmap – 5. Recommendations,” 2019. https://cra.org/ccc/ai-roadmap-recommendations/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[147] Ethicsnet, “Dataset on Ethics.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ethicsnet.org/about.

[148] IA Latam, “Statement of Ethics for the Design, Development, and Use of Artificial Intelligence.” [Online]. Available: https://ia-latam.com/etica-ia-latam/.

[149] IEEE, “Ethics In Action in Autonomous and Intelligent Systems,” 2019. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/ (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[150] Government of the European Union, “Policy and Investment Recommendations for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=60343.

[151] Government of the Republic of Korea, “Mid- to Long-Term Master Plan in Preparation for the Intelligent Information Society,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.msip.go.kr/dynamic/file/afieldfile/msse56/1352869/2017/07/20/ Master Plan for the intelligent information society.pdf.

[152] British Standards Institution, “Robots and robotic devices: Guide to the ethical design and application of robots and robotic systems,” 2016. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0McUk5vAotHcDYzbzh2Y0c4aUE/view (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[153] PATH, “Develops Ethical Guidelines on the Use of AI in Healthcare,” 2019. https://www.prnewswire.com/ news-releases/path-develops-ethical-guidelines-on-the-use-of-ai-in-healthcare-300882699.html (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[154] Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare,” 2019.

[155] International Organization for Standardization, “ISO – IEC/TR 60601-4-1:2017 – Medical electrical equipment — Part 4-1: Guidance and interpretation — Medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems employing a degree of autonomy,” 2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/70755.html?browse=tc (accessed Feb. 03, 2021).

[156] European Parliament, “Texts adopted – Civil Law Rules on Robotics – Thursday, 16 February 2017,” 2017. https:// www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html?redirect (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[157] EPSRC, “Principles of robotics – EPSRC,” 2010. https://epsrc.ukri.org/research/ourportfolio/themes/engineering/activities/principlesofrobotics/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[158] Rathenau Instituut, “Human rights in the robot age: Challenges arising from the use of robotics, artificial intelligence, and virtual and augmented reality Report,” 2017.

[159] International Chamber of Commerce, “ICC Policy Statement on Artificial Intelligence,” 2018. http://www.iccindiaonline.org/ps2019/1.pdf (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[160] FAT/ML, “Principles for Accountable Algorithms and a Social Impact Statement for Algorithms,” 2018. https:// www.fatml.org/resources/principles-for-accountable-algorithms (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[161] Government of Australia, “Artificial Intelligence: Australia’s Ethics Framework,” 2019. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://consult.industry.gov.au/.

[162] International Biometrics & Identification Association, “IBIA Privacy Best Practice Recommendations for Commercial Biometric Use,” 2014. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ibia.org.

[163] IBM, “Data Responsibility at IBM,” 2017. https://www.ibm.com/blogs/policy/dataresponsibility-at-ibm/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[164] Government of Japan, “Report on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society Unofficial translation Advisory Board on Artificial Intelligence and Human Society,” 2017.

[165] UNESCO, “Steering AI and advanced ICTs for knowledge societies: a Rights, Openness, Access, and Multi-stakeholder Perspective,” 2019. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372132 (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[166] Government of Sweden, Artificial Intelligence in Swedish Business and Society: Analysis of Development and Potential. 2018.

[167] Government of Taiwan, “AI Taiwan,” 2018. https://ai.taiwan.gov.tw/ (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[168] U. and D. A. I. Toward a Controlled, “Toward a Controlled, Useful and Demystified Artificial Intelligence,” 2017. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.senat.fr.

[169] Business for Social Responsibility, “Artificial Intelligence: A Rights-Based Blueprint for Business,” 2018. https:// www.bsr.org/en/our-insights/report-view/artificial-intelligence-a-rights-based-blueprint-for-business (accessed Feb. 04, 2021).

[170] Alliance for Multilateralism, “Declaration by the Alliance for Multilateralism on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS),” 2019.

[171] E. Palmerini et al., “RoboLaw Grant Agreement number: 289092 Project acronym: RoboLaw Project title: Regulating Emerging Robotic Technologies in Europe: Robotics facing Law and Ethics Funding scheme: Collaborative project (CP), FP7-SiS-Challenge 1-3: Regulating emerging scientific and technological developments D6.2 Guidelines on Regulating Robotics,” 2014. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.robolaw.eu.

[172] Government of India, “Report of Committee – D: On Cyber Security, Safety, and Ethical Issues,” 2019.

[173] E. Chavannes and A. Arkhipov-Goyal, “The Ethics of Robotic and Autonomous Systems in a Military Context,” 2019.

[174] Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, “Artificial Intelligence: An Evangelical Statement of Principles.” https:// erlc.com/resource-library/statements/artificial-intelligence-an-evangelical-statement-of-principles.

[175] Government of Canada, “Responsible AI in the Government of Canada.” https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sn-qBZUXEUG4dVk909eSg5qvfbpNlRhzIefWPtBwbxY/edit# (accessed Dec. 07, 2020).

[176] UNICRI, “United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute,” 2019. http://www.unicri.it/in_focus/on/interpol_unicri_report_ai (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[177] Isle of Man Government, “Code of Practice for the testing of autonomous vehicles,” 2017.

[178] Université de Montréal, “Declaration of Montréal for a responsible development of AI,” 2018. https://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/ (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[179] Microsoft Corporation, “Healthcare, Artificial Intelligence, Data and Ethics – A 2030 Vision,” 2018.

[180] Government of Canada, “Responsible AI in the Government of Canada,” 2018. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sn-qBZUXEUG4dVk909eSg5qvfbpNlRhzIefWPtBwbxY/edit (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[181] Government of Japan, “Draft AI Utilization Principles,” 2018.

[182] Foundation for Responsible Robotics, “FRR Quality Mark for (AI Based) Robotics – Responsible Robotics,” 2019. https://responsiblerobotics.org/quality-mark/ (accessed Jan. 29, 2021).

[183] Government of Malta, “Malta: Towards Trustworthy AI,” 2019. https://malta.ai/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/ Malta_Towards_Ethical_and_Trustworthy_AI_vFINAL.pdf (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[184] Council of Europe, “Guidelines on Artificial Intelligence and Data Protection,” 2019. Accessed: Feb. 05, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.coe.int/en/web/human-rights-rule-of-law/artificial-intelligence/glossary:

[185] Integrated Justice Information Systems Institute International Association of Chiefs of Police, “Law Enforcement Facial Recognition Use Case Catalog,” 2019.

[186] Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence of the National Science & Technology Council, “The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development Strategic Plan: 2019 Update,” 2019.

[187] United Nations, “Report of the Working Party on Road Traffic Safety on its seventy-fourth session Contents,” 2017.

[188] ANSI UASSC, “Standardization Roadmap for Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” 2018.

[189] Government of the UK, “AI Sector Deal,” 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/artificial-intelligence-sector-deal/ai-sector-deal (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[190] International Organization for Standardization, “Intelligent transport systems — Assisted parking system (APS) — Performance requirements and test procedures,” 2017. https://www.iso.org/standard/73768.html?browse=tc (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).

[191] BusinessEurope, “Artificial Intelligence recommendations,” 2019. https://www.businesseurope.eu/publications/ artificial-intelligence-recommendations (accessed Feb. 05, 2021).